- Sab Dic 14, 2019 12:38 pm
#748840
Un saludo. Es el primer operado por fue a finales de los noventa por el doctor rassman.
https://ibb.co/3zTSgfK
Es el mensaje publicado por el doctor en un foro.
I performed his surgery in the late 1990s before FUE (Follicular Unit Excision) was a known hair transplant procedure offered commercially anywhere. I published the first article on FUE in a peer reviewed medical journal in 2002 and the rest is history. When I presented the article at the 2002 ISHRS meeting (the same month that the article was published) , I gave out a DVD to every one of the 600 or so doctors that were in the audience (which showed, step-by-step how to do FUE). When young men found out that a hair transplant could be done without a linear scar, they came to my office in droves. Doctors realized that this was the procedure to learn and using my DVD the tried to copy what I had taught in the DVD. Unfortunately, in the first year, although thousands of these were done world-wide, few succeeded. It was clearly more difficult than I made it look. Today, most hair transplants are done with FUE and certainly almost all new doctors only learn FUE and don't learn the older proven 'strip surgery' which also works well for the very bald males and most females who don't want to shave the hair in the back of the head. Patients should have a choice in what type of surgery they get but a competent, caring doctor is critical regardless of what skills they may claim to offer.
My advice to anyone seeking a identify a hair transplant doctor is to ask to meet the doctor's patients one-on-one so that you can (1) see the type of results up front, first hand (as that is what you are going to get and must be satisfied that it doesn't look transplanted), (2) ask about the patient's surgical experience (painful or not), (3) ask how long it took until they were presentable to the public and family (I like to have them presentable in a day or two), and (4) find out how the doctor followed-up with the patient (was the doctor responsive to the patient's questions or any problems they had after surgery and were they confident that the doctor cared about them, as human beings (not a money source for the doctor) after the entire surgical experience was over.
William Rassman, M.D.
https://ibb.co/3zTSgfK
Es el mensaje publicado por el doctor en un foro.
I performed his surgery in the late 1990s before FUE (Follicular Unit Excision) was a known hair transplant procedure offered commercially anywhere. I published the first article on FUE in a peer reviewed medical journal in 2002 and the rest is history. When I presented the article at the 2002 ISHRS meeting (the same month that the article was published) , I gave out a DVD to every one of the 600 or so doctors that were in the audience (which showed, step-by-step how to do FUE). When young men found out that a hair transplant could be done without a linear scar, they came to my office in droves. Doctors realized that this was the procedure to learn and using my DVD the tried to copy what I had taught in the DVD. Unfortunately, in the first year, although thousands of these were done world-wide, few succeeded. It was clearly more difficult than I made it look. Today, most hair transplants are done with FUE and certainly almost all new doctors only learn FUE and don't learn the older proven 'strip surgery' which also works well for the very bald males and most females who don't want to shave the hair in the back of the head. Patients should have a choice in what type of surgery they get but a competent, caring doctor is critical regardless of what skills they may claim to offer.
My advice to anyone seeking a identify a hair transplant doctor is to ask to meet the doctor's patients one-on-one so that you can (1) see the type of results up front, first hand (as that is what you are going to get and must be satisfied that it doesn't look transplanted), (2) ask about the patient's surgical experience (painful or not), (3) ask how long it took until they were presentable to the public and family (I like to have them presentable in a day or two), and (4) find out how the doctor followed-up with the patient (was the doctor responsive to the patient's questions or any problems they had after surgery and were they confident that the doctor cared about them, as human beings (not a money source for the doctor) after the entire surgical experience was over.
William Rassman, M.D.
